<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 continued warm trend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.earthsky.org/dankulpinski/2008/01/25/2007-continued-warm-trend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.earthsky.org/dankulpinski/2008/01/25/2007-continued-warm-trend/</link>
	<description>Exploring Science and the Environment</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Earth4Energy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.earthsky.org/dankulpinski/2008/01/25/2007-continued-warm-trend/#comment-1586</link>
		<dc:creator>Earth4Energy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.earthsky.org/dankulpinski/2008/01/25/2007-continued-warm-trend/#comment-1586</guid>
		<description>hopefully 2008 will be a better year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hopefully 2008 will be a better year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.earthsky.org/dankulpinski/2008/01/25/2007-continued-warm-trend/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.earthsky.org/dankulpinski/2008/01/25/2007-continued-warm-trend/#comment-756</guid>
		<description>i find it interesting that these studies predict both, more hurricanes and less hurricanes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i find it interesting that these studies predict both, more hurricanes and less hurricanes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a p garcia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.earthsky.org/dankulpinski/2008/01/25/2007-continued-warm-trend/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>a p garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.earthsky.org/dankulpinski/2008/01/25/2007-continued-warm-trend/#comment-753</guid>
		<description>I was doing my senior thesis on global warming.  It was harder to get information on this subject from NASA than finding chicken's teeth!  I remember reading that a grad student got the same run around from NASA that I did and reversed engineered NASA's data and said that 2007 was not the warmest year and relucnctly NASA agreeded.  I personally saw my thermometers cooler than average! If you think it is hot, spend a summer in Phoenix!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was doing my senior thesis on global warming.  It was harder to get information on this subject from NASA than finding chicken&#8217;s teeth!  I remember reading that a grad student got the same run around from NASA that I did and reversed engineered NASA&#8217;s data and said that 2007 was not the warmest year and relucnctly NASA agreeded.  I personally saw my thermometers cooler than average! If you think it is hot, spend a summer in Phoenix!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom T</title>
		<link>http://blogs.earthsky.org/dankulpinski/2008/01/25/2007-continued-warm-trend/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.earthsky.org/dankulpinski/2008/01/25/2007-continued-warm-trend/#comment-751</guid>
		<description>I guess it depends on who you believe RSS MSU, HADCRUT3, UAH MSU, NOAA or GISS. But what did you expect? The climate doesn't count years. We are in a warm period it would  be very extreaordiay if all of a sudden we had a very cold year. But the trend in  most of these  calculation is slightly downward since 1998.  Actually the difference between them is quite large  considering how small  the change in temperature is trying to  be measured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it depends on who you believe RSS MSU, HADCRUT3, UAH MSU, NOAA or GISS. But what did you expect? The climate doesn&#8217;t count years. We are in a warm period it would  be very extreaordiay if all of a sudden we had a very cold year. But the trend in  most of these  calculation is slightly downward since 1998.  Actually the difference between them is quite large  considering how small  the change in temperature is trying to  be measured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
