<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consider this:  solar power plants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.earthsky.org/beverlyspicer/2008/09/14/consider-this-solar-power-plants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.earthsky.org/beverlyspicer/2008/09/14/consider-this-solar-power-plants/</link>
	<description>Just another EarthSky Blogs weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beverly Spicer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.earthsky.org/beverlyspicer/2008/09/14/consider-this-solar-power-plants/#comment-8166</link>
		<dc:creator>Beverly Spicer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.earthsky.org/beverlyspicer/?p=131#comment-8166</guid>
		<description>Well, I think they ARE considered a type of solar power!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think they ARE considered a type of solar power!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a p garcia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.earthsky.org/beverlyspicer/2008/09/14/consider-this-solar-power-plants/#comment-8165</link>
		<dc:creator>a p garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.earthsky.org/beverlyspicer/?p=131#comment-8165</guid>
		<description>Why are they not condidered a type of solar power since they convert a small portion of the Sun's energy and put this energy "In the Food Chain".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are they not condidered a type of solar power since they convert a small portion of the Sun&#8217;s energy and put this energy &#8220;In the Food Chain&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
