Beverly Spicer

8 Responses to “World clock”

1. 1 Steven Earl Salmony Jul 17th, 2007 at 6:49 am

   Dear Beverly Spicer,

   Perhaps an article by a sure and able friend of mine and of Earth & Sky, Paul Chefurka, can put some of the astounding numbers from the World Clock in perspective by revealing at some of their potentially profound implications.

   http://www.paulchefurka.ca/Population Decline - Red Herrings and Hope.html

   Alternate interpretations of the World Clock numbers from members of the E&S community are welcome here and would be valued.

   Thanks to all,

   Steve

2. 2 Beverly Spicer Jul 17th, 2007 at 11:58 am

   Thank you Steve, and let me reinforce your invitation to Paul and others in the EartySky community to give us their thoughts about the astounding numbers seen on the World Clock.

3. 3 2wicky Jul 17th, 2007 at 12:08 pm

   That’s really cool - It’s really impressive how fast the death counts and birth counts go up after clicking the now button.

4. 4 Deborah Byrd Jul 17th, 2007 at 4:23 pm

   Wow! Thanks Beverly!

5. 5 Steven Earl Salmony Jul 17th, 2007 at 8:38 pm

   Dear Beverly and Deborah,

   The human population numbers to which you are drawing attention are vital, I believe. Perhaps we can look at the numbers and consider ways in which we can understand what they could mean for human and environmental health in the next decade of Century XXI.

   Something that has concerned me in the past several years is the following realization: I have slowly come to the conclusion too many people in my not-so-great generation are simply unwilling to openly acknowledge certain human-driven, looming challenges, soon to be confronted by humanity because none of us knows how to respond to them. Perhaps the brightest and best in my generation have chosen to remain willfully blind and electively mute, and, thereby, leave these problems for our children to discover, address and overcome. If so, such a determination to remain silent is exceedingly disappointing.

   For me, such a choice to consciously deny that which could somehow be real, based upon the best available good scientific evidence, is unacceptable. While I do not have ‘answers’ to pressing global problems already visible on the far horizon, I do retain great confidence that our children will respond ably to requirements of their practical reality. I believe the old laggards among us could still choose to help our young people, but thus far have chosen instead not to serve our children well enough by failing to do the one thing we can certainly do now: communicate frankly about certain daunting global challenges, especially in light of their distinctly human derivation and their potentially profound implications for the future of life on Earth.

   I believe experts from many professional disciplines, inside and outside natural philosophy and science, will soon do better to help our children save life as we know it for coming generations.

   Sincerely,

   Steve

6. 6 Beverly Spicer Jul 17th, 2007 at 9:28 pm

   Steve,

   Thank you so much for your thoughtful commentary. You articulate very well what I think most of us feel. Hopefully, by expressing such thoughts and observations on blogs, in letters, at work, at home, or just standing in the line in the grocery store, these kinds of consciousness-raising and inspirational words will bring us eventually to realize how to deal with the daunting challenges before us. Your words say it very well: there is hope!

7. 7 Lisa Jul 23rd, 2007 at 10:32 am

   Fascinating clock! Its a little scary about the population count - it increases WAY TOO quickly!

1. 1 Astrolink [Global Edition] » Astrosphere for July 17, 2007 | Latest astronomy news in 11 languages Pingback on Jul 17th, 2007 at 3:25 pm

Leave a Reply