Today I would like draw attention to Darfur, a sub-Saharan region in western Sudan currently suffering the consequences of one of the world’s worst man-caused catastrophes. Not only do people die there because of an on-going ethnic conflict - that according to UN estimates has killed more than 200,000 people and made more than 2.5 million others flee their homes in the past four years - but also because of the region’s environment and geography.
The outset of the conflict dates back to February 2003 after a rebel group launched attacks against government targets arguing that the Arab-dominated government in Khartoum had neglected the region and oppressed black Africans in favor of Arabs.
This land has witnessed decades of confrontation between nomads (mostly Arabs) and settled farmers (both Arabs and Africans) who have fought for an impoverished region lacking water, food and decent shelter. The two main rebel groups, the Sudan Liberation Army and the Justice and Equality Movement, mostly recruit their men from the Fur, Zaghawa and Massaleit ethnic groups. The other side of the conflict is mainly staged by the Janjaweed Militias – presumably backed by Sudan’s government – who have been allegedly accused of committing widespread atrocities including “ethnic cleansing” of black Africans. The Sudanese government, led by President Omar al-Bashir, has denied being in control of the Janjaweed despite having admitted that it mobilized defensive militias immediately after rebel attacks took place.
Darfur’s refugees have reported that the Janjaweed Militias have kidnapped and sexually abused women, butchered men and burned villages to the ground. Many Darfurians have fled their villages seeking safe haven in camps at larger towns in Darfur. But competition for resources is fierce, so some leave the camps looking for water or food, and that’s when the Janjaweed militia-men, who patrol outside the camps, kill the men and abduct the women. Some Darfurians have crossed the border and settled in next door neighbor Chad but face similar problems as they have landed in an area so close to the border that are yet exposed to Sudan’s militias.
Darfur has become center stage for a major humanitarian crisis as the rest of the world watches the drama unfold. The refugee camps are places where people stop being people, where children do not even have to worry about enjoying their rights because they never had them to begin with. They’re no longer children, instead they are refugees. Aid workers and agencies can only provide rough estimates of how many people have been killed and are caught up in war because gaining access to conflict areas is quite a difficult task. And this is reflected on the reports, which cannot differentiate between Darfurians who have died from starvation, disease or as victims of violence.
Human rights groups and some countries like the US have described the situation as “genocide”, while the UN has declined to label it as such in light of on-site investigations reporting that the bloodshed in Darfur is only the result of war crimes. Long have the US and the UK threatened to impose sanctions on Sudan if it does not disband the Janjaweed and allow for a larger UN peacekeeping force in the region. But despite such threats and international pressure, the Sudanese government’s promise of disarming the Janjaweed has not materialized. Moreover, Sudan’s allies China and Russia, as permanent Security Council members, have used their veto power to block UN Security Council resolutions. Since US efforts have failed to persuade all UN permanent members to agree to impose sanctions on the African country, the US announced earlier this year sanctions on Sudan. These have targeted 30 companies - mostly in the oil industry - and banned three individuals from trading with the US.
But many are the challenges facing Darfurians. Most sub-Saharan areas are exposed to a harsh environment that poses serious dangers to the region’s limited natural resources and people’s lives. As the conflict intensifies, conditions worsen: an increasing number of refugees are confined to live in a land that shrinks everyday. Temperatures are so high that there’s very little arable land and soon do those few areas become a reason for further conflict. With population overgrowth, less land to cultivate, lower production of food crops, a shortage of medicines and drought, it is hard to imagine that Darfurians might look at their future optimistically. Some experts argue that climate change will exacerbate living conditions in the region contributing to an increase in hostilities and the worsening of on-going fights for scarce resources. Some say that global warming is a present reality for Africans. It is not hard to guess that the Darfur crisis has also been linked to climate change. Is global warming a factor being overlooked and that might have triggered the conflict in the first place? There are those who believe that the crisis is an early sign of what we’re in for unless the world’s powers urgently take action to prevent a further increase in temperatures and reduce carbon emissions. It seems that death, whether as a result of violence, starvation or disease, has taken its root in Darfur and will continue advancing steadily across the sub-Saharan region.
Putting an end to Darfur’s struggle will heavily depend on whether the world’s developed nations are capable of joining efforts to make all sides commit to discontinuing hostilities and allow for the establishment of a peacekeeping force large enough to be able to contain the violence. Also limited by its geography, sub-Saharan Africa needs to devise sensible water management policies and revise existing land-use strategies to optimize its natural resources. With global warming decreasing access to such scarce resources, Africa will need to find in the world’s powers an ally committed to reducing carbon emissions. And as much a tragedy Darfur’s crisis is, it might serve as an example of the key measures governments must implement in order to tackle this and prevent similar conflicts from breaking out elsewhere. Ultimately, the disaster is such that it requires to be addressed from a holistic standpoint, with governments acting jointly at social, political, financial and environmental levels.
I would like to invite you to reflect on the facts above because it is rather easy to forget the suffering of others when we have a place that we can call “home”.

Freak’in China will never agree on any sanctions against Sudan because they have too much money invested. And you can’t depend on Russia (their leader still has too much KGB in his blood). I am afraid the poor people in Darfur will continue to suffer. And why does our media so afraid to mention that there are mostly Christians being killed by Muslim extremists? This sounds a lot like the killing that went on in Indonesia.
Aitana, thank you for taking the time to write this …
Deborah
Aitana is right in that Darfur may be an example of what can happen when resources become too scarce to sustain a region. We may see more of this type of conflict and struggle in the future. How we as a global community react to the Darfur situation will tell how we will respond with similar struggles that are looming in the poorer regions of the world. This problem is one of the biggest problem facing humans. Will Americans look up from American Idol and notice?
If the situation in Darfur is (as I think you are saying) a result of population pressure within an environment with a finite supply of resources, which is diminishing because of climate change, then what can be done? Assuming that reversing climate change will take a long time, then for the foreseeable future there will continue to be the problem of too many people competing for too few resources. Even if it were possible to bring peace to the region the underlying problems would not really change.
I’m not arguing against action, I’m really just asking the question – what can be done? In the past, U.S. military involvement in ethnic conflicts has mostly succeeded in uniting the indigenous people against the invading westerners, so I would propose that to be a bad idea. As I understand it efforts to motivate regional forces to get involved have been unsuccessful. Perhaps (likely) those efforts have been lackluster.
I don’t know if I am any more ignorant about this situation than the average American, but about all I know is that it looks like a really bad situation, and something should be done. But really, what would it take to bring peace to this region? And then what would it take to mitigate the underlying conditions that cause the conflict?
Texas_JAM: ‘And why does our media so afraid to mention that there are mostly Christians being killed by Muslim extremists?’ - Hi Texas_JAM. The people of Darfur are all Muslim. There are Christians in the south of Sudan and there was indeed a long conflict there too, but Darfur is an entirely Muslim region.
I think David LaFerney asks an interesting question above. If the situation in Darfur is … a result of population pressure within an environment with a finite supply of resources, which is diminishing because of climate change, then what can be done?
I wonder - if what David describes in this sentence is true - then can’t the same be said of Earth as a whole?
Should we be trying - as a whole human species inhabiting a world with increasing population pressure, diminishing resources, and a changing climate - to use situations like that in Darfur as a blueprint for solving these same sorts of situations, as they continue to arise, around the world in the coming century?
Are we, as a species, civilized or not?
Do we stand by and do nothing while our fellow humans suffer?
Aitana,
Your article is painful to read. Hopefully, we as as species can face the daunting challenge and change things for the better.
Bruce
Interesting story: Satellite images put all eyes on Darfur
A new UN Security Council resolution has approved the deployment of up to 26,000 troops (both UN and African Union) to quell violence in Darfur. Sudan has promised to cooperate with the more than tripled existing peacekeeping force. The deployment’s main mission is to protect civilians against attacks. The use of force has been allowed to defend the troops and protect civilians and aid workers. There is however, not threat of sanction did Sudan not comply.
I realize the global warming scare is real popular right now, next one will be global ice age… but the real problem is they all live in a desert, and thus water and resources are hard to come by. They don’t have millions of automobiles driving around, so you can’t blame that, they don’t have the skyscrappers and the factories so you can’t blame that…. bottom line they live in a desert! Its like LA folks complaining of the heat and the drought…. we also live in a freakin desert, so the fact that we have extremely intelligent engineers who have deviced a water pipeline to drain the excess of our mountains to us SoCal folks is what is amazing… but if it weren’t for that we would also be starving… but I guarantee you SoCal folks would all move if that were the case… cause we live in a desert too!
Its a mess over there, as it is also in other parts of Africa where the Muslim extremist are killing off the innocent Christians and other muslim groups that they don’t like, but to link global warming to this problem is grabbing perverbal global warming fear tactic straws! PLEASE, can we just focus on the real problems and not waste our time on trying to tie this fear tactic hoax in every problem in the world!